add that to your Switchboard...winks arnt as simple but that have meen talked about on theis forum...so you should do a search _________________ [ matt ]
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 562 Location: Netherlands
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 11:43 am Post subject:
Actually, no, Matt.
As Mat007 points out the objects are being sent using Datacasts. This was changed since 732 or so so the official client could also send Winks in multi-person conversations. The default Winks don't require a Stamp field, and you can simply send those.
A Wink is being requested the same way a DP or CE is being requested.. Even got the same EUF-GUID. Simple enough to match the object in the Context field with the cab file you "obviously" have somewhere in your bots directory structure and to send it in a couple of steps after that.
You aren't completely off, however. Yes, the Stamp field is being used by BlueMountain Winks, but it is not the data. The Stamp field is an xxx bit fingerprint of the Wink later encoded with B64. It serves a security purpose and is impossible to recreate (ZoRo did a lot of rev engineering on this over the past 2, 3 weeks). I guess that the e-mail address or something similar has not been included in the Stamp, so theoretically, if you sniff the Wink object you could make your BOT send it. Also note that the Stamp field is not being included in the SHA1C field.